<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Dependant on Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/05/not-dependant-on-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/05/not-dependant-on-google/</link>
	<description>Merging of Traditional Media, SEM and Social Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:50:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sterling</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/05/not-dependant-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-12969</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/05/not-dependant-on-google/#comment-12969</guid>
		<description>It has baffled me for some time now that people spend so much time trying to optimize for the search engines even though they get slammed or &#039;slapped&#039; several times a year by the changing of algorithms.

I do some minor SEO stuff, but learning SMO or Social Media Optimization seems like the smart choice as the web 2.0 landscape continues to be dominated by being part of social communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has baffled me for some time now that people spend so much time trying to optimize for the search engines even though they get slammed or &#8217;slapped&#8217; several times a year by the changing of algorithms.</p>
<p>I do some minor SEO stuff, but learning SMO or Social Media Optimization seems like the smart choice as the web 2.0 landscape continues to be dominated by being part of social communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Universal Search and SEO: SEO is Dead Part 2 at Emergence Media</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/05/not-dependant-on-google/comment-page-1/#comment-11517</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Universal Search and SEO: SEO is Dead Part 2 at Emergence Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/05/not-dependant-on-google/#comment-11517</guid>
		<description>[...] As state by David Wilson: What GUS does in short is reduces the number of organic listings available on the home page. No longer is getting to the first page of Google good enough. Now you need to be in the top 5 or 6 positions as the rest will be taken by video and news. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As state by David Wilson: What GUS does in short is reduces the number of organic listings available on the home page. No longer is getting to the first page of Google good enough. Now you need to be in the top 5 or 6 positions as the rest will be taken by video and news. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
