<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third Time Lucky For Wal-Mart?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/07/third-time-lucky-for-wal-mart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/07/third-time-lucky-for-wal-mart/</link>
	<description>Merging of Traditional Media, SEM and Social Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilson</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/07/third-time-lucky-for-wal-mart/comment-page-1/#comment-16429</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/07/third-time-lucky-for-wal-mart/#comment-16429</guid>
		<description>I agree Adam. Wal-Mart loves the idea of SMO. They just don&#039;t want to give up control of the message or conversation.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Adam. Wal-Mart loves the idea of SMO. They just don&#8217;t want to give up control of the message or conversation.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/07/third-time-lucky-for-wal-mart/comment-page-1/#comment-16397</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2007/07/third-time-lucky-for-wal-mart/#comment-16397</guid>
		<description>I suspect you&#039;re right about who Wal-Mart will ultimately handle this latest foray into SMM. They just don&#039;t seem to get that you can&#039;t control the discussion.

Sure, you can be involved and help guide the discussion--that&#039;s part of the idea behind SMO and SMM--but you can&#039;t control it. Sadly, despite having two projects fail for this very reason, I think that Wal-Mart will still try and control the discussion, either by quietly deleting negative reviews, or by abandoning the project all together if too many negative reviews are submitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect you&#8217;re right about who Wal-Mart will ultimately handle this latest foray into SMM. They just don&#8217;t seem to get that you can&#8217;t control the discussion.</p>
<p>Sure, you can be involved and help guide the discussion&#8211;that&#8217;s part of the idea behind SMO and SMM&#8211;but you can&#8217;t control it. Sadly, despite having two projects fail for this very reason, I think that Wal-Mart will still try and control the discussion, either by quietly deleting negative reviews, or by abandoning the project all together if too many negative reviews are submitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

