<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace Numbers Look Strange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/</link>
	<description>Merging of Traditional Media, SEM and Social Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:06:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emandelbaum</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/comment-page-1/#comment-76145</link>
		<dc:creator>emandelbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/#comment-76145</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@frmrDJ so far I have found this http://bit.ly/wSWU not exactly what i am looking for but a start.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@frmrDJ so far I have found this <a href="http://bit.ly/wSWU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/wSWU</a> not exactly what i am looking for but a start.</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margery Hyde</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/comment-page-1/#comment-58578</link>
		<dc:creator>Margery Hyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/#comment-58578</guid>
		<description>What is the percentage of single moms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the percentage of single moms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robeta Kowald</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/comment-page-1/#comment-57248</link>
		<dc:creator>Robeta Kowald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/#comment-57248</guid>
		<description>Ahhhh...statistics and I hate to say it but both sides of this are probably right...and the truth is somewhere in between...

For example...Myspace and many other sites have a self-disclosed income, gender, and age criterion when you sign up. If that&#039;s where they are getting their data then that&#039;s probably what it says - those who sign up are such-and-such a demographic and such-and-such age etc. 

 The problem is that it isn&#039;t verifiable data from any other source... So, like many things on the internet this may not be all that it seems. S0o while I might identify and show up in the database as a 45 year old Mom who makes over $100,000 a year... in reality I am an underpaid teenager working minimum wage.  

Self-disclosure is the bane of social statisticians everywhere...because well, people lie and they especially lie about basic facts. Some fascinating studies of online dating show that this income is, in fact, one of the &quot;big three&quot; people lie about on dating sites (the others being &quot;marital status&quot; and &quot;age&quot;). 

So it surprises me that marketing folks would jump so quickly into a pool based on data that may or may not be all that accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh&#8230;statistics and I hate to say it but both sides of this are probably right&#8230;and the truth is somewhere in between&#8230;</p>
<p>For example&#8230;Myspace and many other sites have a self-disclosed income, gender, and age criterion when you sign up. If that&#8217;s where they are getting their data then that&#8217;s probably what it says &#8211; those who sign up are such-and-such a demographic and such-and-such age etc. </p>
<p> The problem is that it isn&#8217;t verifiable data from any other source&#8230; So, like many things on the internet this may not be all that it seems. S0o while I might identify and show up in the database as a 45 year old Mom who makes over $100,000 a year&#8230; in reality I am an underpaid teenager working minimum wage.  </p>
<p>Self-disclosure is the bane of social statisticians everywhere&#8230;because well, people lie and they especially lie about basic facts. Some fascinating studies of online dating show that this income is, in fact, one of the &#8220;big three&#8221; people lie about on dating sites (the others being &#8220;marital status&#8221; and &#8220;age&#8221;). </p>
<p>So it surprises me that marketing folks would jump so quickly into a pool based on data that may or may not be all that accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Ricci</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/comment-page-1/#comment-57078</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/#comment-57078</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on this one.  All of the demographic information I have seen (including the media kit info from MySpace) says the audience is younger and less affluent than some of the other social networking sites.  Take a look at what Quantcast is saying for MySpace demos... http://www.quantcast.com/myspace.com. 

I will say that MySpace has HUGE reach.  So, if only 19% of MySpace visitors make over $100k per year, that&#039;s still roughly 14 million people!

It will be interesting to see how the campaign works for them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one.  All of the demographic information I have seen (including the media kit info from MySpace) says the audience is younger and less affluent than some of the other social networking sites.  Take a look at what Quantcast is saying for MySpace demos&#8230; <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/myspace.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quantcast.com/myspace.com</a>. </p>
<p>I will say that MySpace has HUGE reach.  So, if only 19% of MySpace visitors make over $100k per year, that&#8217;s still roughly 14 million people!</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the campaign works for them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/comment-page-1/#comment-55425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-media-optimization.com/2008/07/myspace-numbers-look-strange/#comment-55425</guid>
		<description>Actually those numbers seem right. According to our studies we have found that ALL moms on the internet in the US average to roughly 30-45% on myspace AND facebook. those were the stats, as for all soccer moms and the rich,? No comment..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually those numbers seem right. According to our studies we have found that ALL moms on the internet in the US average to roughly 30-45% on myspace AND facebook. those were the stats, as for all soccer moms and the rich,? No comment..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
